from The Economist, September 18th, 1999. http://www.economist.com
The theory of non-linear dynamics could help scientists to understand,
and even
treat, some medical conditions
THE study of non-linear dynamics, more popularly known as chaos theory,
has been
hailed as the key to understanding everything from weather systems and
earthquakes
to traffic jams and stockmarkets. But it is one thing to show that a particular
phenomenon displays chaotic behaviour. It is quite another to exploit that
knowledge
for any useful purpose.
The latest field to embrace the idea of chaos is medicine. Specialists
in non-linear
dynamics are doing their best to understand the workings of the brain,
heart and
immune system using chaos theory. In the most recent example, published
in the
current issue of the journal Chaos, a physicist, Raima Larter, and a neurosurgeon,
Robert Worth, both at Purdue University in Indianapolis, have used chaos
theory to
simulate what happens in the brain before some kinds of epileptic seizures.
Based
on their work, new treatments of epilepsy that do not require surgery might
become
possible.
Perhaps surprisingly, chaos in the brain is a sign of health, not disease.
During an
epileptic seizure, the disorderly jumble of brain activity suddenly becomes
abnormally regular. Dr Larter and Dr Worth were interested in what causes
this
transition in a class of epileptic fits called partial seizures. In these
seizures, only
part of the brain starts off behaving abnormally; but as neighbouring regions
are
co-opted, the seizure spreads to the rest of the brain. Patients who suffer
from partial
seizures are the least responsive to medical treatments and often have
to resort to
surgery, in which the abnormal brain tissue is removed. Surgery is, however,
ineffective for about 10% of patients, and it is also dangerous: removing
too much
brain tissue can lead to memory loss and to speech and vision impairment.
Most research into partial seizures has concentrated on trying to find
out what was
wrong with the abnormal part of the brain. Dr Larter and Dr Worth looked
at the
trickier problem of how bad tissue manages to coerce healthy tissue into
misbehaving, by using a computer to model the behaviour of thousands of
the brain’s
nerve cells, called neurons. Starting with standard non-linear equations
that describe
the behaviour of individual neurons, they linked about a thousand neurons
together to
represent the abnormally behaving part of the brain. They then linked up
neighbouring groups of healthy neurons.
While tweaking the equations used in the model, one of Dr Larter’s students,
Brent
Speelman, found that the rate at which the abnormal part of the brain communicated
with the healthy parts was a crucial factor in determining whether those
parts
continued to behave well. When there was more frequent communication between
healthy and abnormal parts, the seizure spread. At slower speeds, however,
the
healthy neurons continued their chaotic firing. What makes this finding
more than a
cute mathematical exercise is recent experimental evidence which suggests
that the
brain might possess a mechanism to regulate the rate at which neurons communicate
with one another.
Clusters of neurons are usually thought to communicate via the diffusion
of
potassium ions. But the rate at which potassium ions diffuse is constant,
so this
mechanism does not permit variations in the rate of communication between
neurons.
There is, however, another process involving calcium ions that might. Calcium
ions
are present in glial cells, until recently thought to be an inactive glue
that held
neurons together. When these ions are released, they travel through the
brain as a
“chemical wave” at different speeds. Although nobody knows what causes
the wave,
the researchers think an imbalance in the brain makes the wave move faster,
increasing the speed of communication between neurons—and causing a seizure.
So
it is possible that carefully designed drugs, or suitably administered
electrical
impulses, might slow the waves down and prevent the seizure entirely.
Disorderly brains, orderly hearts
The heart is another part of the body where chaos is being brought to bear.
It would
be poetic if physiologists found that the normal state of the heart, like
that of the
brain, was chaotic turmoil; but it is not. Normally, orderly waves of electric
activity
pass through the cardiac tissue, causing the heart muscle to contract.
Sometimes,
however, these waves become horribly distorted and make the heart beat
erratically,
a condition called cardiac fibrillation. At present, the most common treatment
is to
administer a massive (and painful) electric shock.
Many physicists and physiologists suspect that fibrillation is chaotic,
and are trying
to model it in order to find ways of stabilising the dangerous convulsions.
But
according to Daniel Gauthier, a physicist at Duke University in North Carolina,
if
cardiac fibrillation is chaotic, it is not the usual kind of chaos. Most
chaotic signals
involve unpredictable behaviour over periods of time. But what happens
in the heart
is known as spatio-temporal chaos, since the chaos extends over different
locations
in the heart. The way to stabilise a chaotic heart would be to wait until
it comes
closer to a more periodic state and then give it a small electric shock
to nudge it into
that state. But this would be much harder if different parts of the heart
had to be
nudged in different ways.
Recent experiments by Dr Gauthier’s group and others have, however, been
encouraging. One prediction from models of a chaotically beating heart
is the
break-up of regular electrical impulses into spirals, causing uneven contractions.
Recently, researchers have observed these spirals in both human and animal
hearts
during cardiac fibrillation. Dr Gauthier’s group is now experimenting on
sheep to try
to administer small electric shocks and bring the chaos under control.
Another
group, led by William Ditto at the Georgia Institute of Technology and
Francis
Witkowski at the University of Alberta, is using a dye that lights up in
response to
voltage changes to map the heart’s response. Both groups have had some
success in
controlling chaos in small portions of the heart. The eventual goal is
to be able to
stabilise a fibrillating heart using several tiny shocks, rather than one
massive one.
Meanwhile, another group led by Mark Yeager at Dartmouth College in New
Hampshire is trying to identify patterns of chaos in the immune system.
Dr Yeager
has done some preliminary experiments that suggest that the erratic activity
of white
blood cells is a form of chaotic behaviour.
If that is true, then certain drugs designed to affect the immune system
might be more
effective if delivered as small doses at different times, rather than as
a single,
continuous dose. This would be useful in cases of severe injury where the
immune
system turns against the body and causes organs to shut down one by one.
Instead of
using anti-inflammatory drugs simply to suppress the immune system, it
might be
possible to tweak it back to its normal behaviour. Dr Yeager plans to start
testing
this idea later this year. Perhaps he, and other medical researchers, will
find delight
in disorder.
Raima Larter, Robert Worth and Brent Speelman’s article can be ordered from Chaos. Information on William Ditto’s research is available at the Applied Chaos Lab. James Collins has made abstracts of some of his research available at his homepage.