Need Recognition
Influences upon Problem Recognition
Situational – you’re hungry, out of gas,
at a business lunch
Consumer - friends, family, people
at work – “experts in a product class”
Marketing - tactics that your firm
can develop and use to illustrate a problem, show how your product or service
“solves” the problem
Find out . . .
What triggers problem recognition?
Actually being in a problem situation? Talking to others? Seeing ads?
Provide consumers with the opportunity
to recognize their needs for products or services – e.g,. MBA at night
for employed adults
How deliberately do they search? Before
purchase? After? Ongoing?
How do consumers search for the products/
services your companies provide?
Consumer Search
Internal search: retrieval of knowledge
from memory
External search: collection of additional
information from the environment
Is the collected information correct?
eg Do Hispanics use coupons? Do
Hispanics reject coupon use “because they are a proud people?”
Consumer Search
Internal search: retrieval of knowledge
from memory, what do you know about the doctors listed in your HMO booklet?
External search: collection of additional
information from the environment, what can your friends and coworkers tell
you about the doctors in your HMO booklet?
Prepurchase search - simulated by the
need
Ongoing search - regular scanning
How Much Search Is Done?
Extended (extensive) decision making:
much search, comparisons, rational, high involvement, compensatory heuristic
Limited Problem Solving: simple decision
rules are applied, based on prior knowledge, heuristics, noncompensatory
Habitual or Routinized Response Behavior:
no search, automatic, repetitious, known brands, low involvement
More Risk Means More Search
Monetary Risk
Functional Risk
Physical Risk
Social Risk
Psychological Risk
Can I Afford it? HMO?
Will it break down?
Will I get hurt?
What will my friends or family think?
Will I feel bad about myself?
Search is related to the types of goods
that are sought.
Specialty goods: those products that consumer
has developed strong preferences.
Shopping goods: those products that the
consumer must devote time and effort to compare and contrast.
Convenience goods: those products that
the consumer is reluctant to spend time and effort to purchase.
Unsought goods: those we need but are
reluctant to buy, funeral planning
Pre-purchase Alternative Evaluation
Does the set of alternatives meet consumer
needs?
Evaluative criteria: price, brand
name, country of origin, etc.
Salience: relative weight of criteria
- determinant attributes
Can you suggest some others?
What are evaluative criteria for health
care? For tourism?
Pre-purchase Evaluation of Alternatives
The process of evaluating alternatives
identified from search, which leads to product or brand most likely to
satisfy the consumer
Can use new or preexisting evaluations stored in memory
Evaluative criteria: standards and specifications used to compare different products and brands
Pre-purchase Evaluation of Alternatives
Getting into the Consideration (Evoked)
Set
Universal set: all alternatives
Retrieval set (what you are aware of)
vs. Unawareness set (what you don’t know)
Consideration set =
set of acceptable alternatives
Inert Set = aware of,
would not consider
Inept Set = aware of,
avoided
What goes into the sets which you reject?
Cutoffs, signals (eg rating in Consumer
Reports)
How Companies Can Get Into Consumers’
Consideration Sets
Ask to be in the set
Adjust one of the 4Ps
Encourage consumers to consider its brand and competitors’ brand
Attraction effect: enhance odds of becoming
consumer choice by adding an inferior product to the consideration set
What Is the Relative Importance of Each
Criterion?
Importance = salience
Salience varies by the product and by
the situation
Some product attributes may be salient
to some consumers, but unimportant to others
Determinant attributes: those attributes
that have a direct influence on alternative evaluation and final choice.
Some attributes are both salient (important)
and determinant (necessary), some are important but not necessary to consider
Noncompensatory Decision Rules
A weakness on one attribute cannot “compensate”
for a strength on another
Disjunctive: decide which criteria
are determinant (or not) and then establish a minimum score for each one
Conjunctive: all criteria are determinant,
product must meet all cutoffs
Lexicographic: comparison on the
most important attribute - car must have good mpg
Elimination by Aspects: use of cutoffs,
must have mpg > 25
Poor medical care (determinant) can not
be offset by a beautiful waiting room with good service
Compensatory Decision Rules
Attributes can compensate for each other
simple additive : sum number of times
each alternative is favorably evaluated
weighted additive: some attributes
are more important than others
How does this work with toothpaste?
Healthcare? MBA programs?
Heuristics: rules of thumb: I
always buy brand X
Price: Higher priced products always
have higher quality.
Natural products are always healthy.
Common Market Beliefs often are found
in a given region or country - do you believe any of these? E.g.
“Cereals are served with cold milk.”
Brand: Certain brands are used as
guarantees of quality and satisfaction.
Brand equity: a quantifiable value
of goodwill
More Heuristics
Inertia - just repeat what you have always
done
Variety seeking - something different
each time
Brand loyalty - switching - alternating
How will direct marketing affect brand
loyalty?
Country of Origin - “Buy American”
Japanese products have higher quality