Lecture Outline for September
24, 1999 STS Internet & Society
Note: I have added links to this page.
It can be used as a sample of the assignment you should prepare for October
29.
Why look at metaphysics?
-
previous efforts at AI have oversimplified
"mind"
-
the metaphysicians have been examining
how we think for centuries, and they have reached some interesting conclusions
-
many of the metaphysicians have
anticipated ideas that scientists have discovered only much later:
atoms, quantum indeterminacy, digital logic, for example
-
it is likely that our brains evolved
as they did because that is the best way to think, other intelligent beings
would probably think in much the same way - including ones we might create
-
we need a vision of the big picture,
as well as detailed computer code
Charles
Saunders Peirce
-
an interesting thinker because
he was both a philosopher and a scientist
-
he anticipated many key findings
simply by thinking about how he and others thought - his assumption was
that the rest of the world would function much as his brain did
-
spontaneity rather than determinism
-
random swerving of microscopic
particles
-
the brain has no central cell
-
small integers as fundamental
units of organization in the universe - numbers as "archetypes"
Numbers as Archetypes
-
many philosophers have seen numbers
- particularly the small integers - as "archetypal",
as a fundamental organizing principle for reality. The Pythagoreans
were especially strong on this idea.
-
Peirce was particularly taken
with first,
second and third as archetypes. But he also thought about
zero, and about combinations of the first three, e.g., firstness of
second, secondness of third, etc.
-
Carl
Jung also thought numbers were archetypal, but he placed much more
emphasis on the number four which he saw as the archetype of synergy, or
self-sustaining order. Ben and I agree with Jung on this. Higher
numbers can also be seen as archetypal
-
this may seem like foolish speculation,
but it is remarkable that the same imagery occurs both in classical creation
myths and in the latest astronomical theories of the origins of the universe
Naught, the Formless Void
-
the original state of the universe
- some physicists believe that a "zero-point
field" or quantum vacuum underlies all apparent mass and energy in
the universe.
-
scientific astronomy has reached
the same conclusion
-
not the same as the integer "0"
- this is something before arithmetic existed, before order of any kind
existed
-
also found in many religious traditions,
e.g., the Buddhist concept of the "Formless
Void" - meditation seeks to bring the worshipper into this state
-
perhaps this concept is captured
by The
Really Big Button That Doesn't Do Anything.
-
complex systems theory also shows
that order can emerge out of chaos
First, Raw Being
-
the conception of being or existing
independent of anything else
-
the first step in the emergence
of order out of chaos
-
in human psychology, firstness
comprises feelings that are immediately present, such as pain, blue, cheerfulness,
the feeling that arises when we contemplate a consistent theory, when we
contemplate God.
-
in physics, it is the quantum
indeterminacy of matter, behavior which does not follow any law
-
in philosophy, it is usually equated
with idealism, the position that ideas just emerge on their own rather
than being determined by physical realities
Secondness, The Reacting Object
-
for Peirce, secondness is the
conception of being relative to, the conception of reaction with, something
else
-
in psychology, sensations of reaction
-
in physics, laws of relationship
between variables
-
in mathematics, a vector - a line
with an arrow at the end, having both position and direction
-
in complex systems theory, the
movement from one state to another
Thirdness, The Evolving Interpretation
-
for Peirce, this is habit, abstract
thought, the process whereby two things are understood to be in a relationshp
-
these feelings and thoughts about
relationships come to have a existence of their own
-
in the physical sciences, thirdness
is general theories or principles such as the Theory of Evolution, Quantum
Theory, Newtonian Mechanics
-
in mathematics, thirdness is a
pattern or equation which explains how systems are related. Geometrically
it is represented by a triangle
-
in general, it is a pattern that
emerges from a series of numbers
-
example: "The
Rule of Threes"
Fourthness, The Unity of Consciousness
-
Peirce did not think in terms
of fourthness, which led him into a lot of confusing terminology such as
Firstness of Second. Some people like these complex theories, others
do not
-
Carl Jung stressed the quaternity,
seeing it as the minimal number for representing a unified system:
a collection of overlapping, synergetic relationships.
-
fourthness is a pattern which
emerges from a web of relationships which support and sustain each other
so that the whole is greater than the sum of the parts
-
this concept is often captured
by the word "synergy"
-
geometrically, fourthness is the
tetrahedron
-
Buckminster
Fuller was a creative exponent of the tetrahedron
-
fourthness can also be represented
as a dual network, combining hierarchy and heterarchy - this is how we
think of it in Webmind
-
this kind of emergence of thought
is the essence of what we call "thinking" in the brain
-
truly intelligent AI systems will
have to be able to do this, not just follow instructions
Friedrich Nietszche
-
a philosopher that many people
have found profoundly inspiring
-
often thought of as a nihilist,
a person preoccupied with nothingness
-
he saw the "will to power" as
the force which enabled people to overcome nothingness
-
Neitzsche's "will to power" is
equivalent to Peirce's "one law of mind". Order emerges out of chaos
because it just does.
-
the universe is a huge pool of
entities, struggling with each other, leading to an emerging reality
Archetypal Patterns Can Be Observed
in Many Realms of Reality