Chicago Council Tries Anew
With
Anti-Gang Ordinance
By DIRK JOHNSON
CHICAGO,
Feb. 21 -- Trying to thwart gangs
without running afoul of constitutional rights, the
Chicago City Council has
passed an anti-loitering
ordinance that allows the
police to order suspicious
crowds to scatter.
The measure, which limits
enforcement to high-crime
areas, drew criticism from
some council members, who
said it singled out racial
minorities. But a majority of
black members of the Council
approved the bill as a
tool to fight crime.
A similar measure passed
in 1992 was struck down last
June in a 6-to-3 vote of
the United States Supreme
Court, which said it was
too vague. But Justice Sandra
Day O'Connor, in a concurring
opinion, wrote that the
Chicago measure could be
rewritten in ways to make it
acceptable.
The new measure, backed by
Mayor Richard M. Daley
and passed by the Council
in a 44-to-5 vote last
Wednesday, addressed the
concerns about the earlier
measure's vagueness by specifically
citing "gang and
narcotics loitering." It
allows the police to order
loiterers to disband within
five minutes, and to "remove
themselves from within sight
and hearing" of a
designated spot for at least
three hours.
Under the measure, the city
would limit enforcement to
designated "hot spots" in
neighborhoods with high rates
of crime. Under the earlier
anti-loitering ordinance,
which was lifted in 1995
after lower court rulings
against it, the police made
more than 40,000 arrests.
The Chicago ordinance is
one of dozens of
anti-loitering measures
passed around the nation in
recent years by cities trying
to deal with crime and, in
some cases, homeless people.
The City Council in Annapolis,
Md., approved a
measure last week that bars
convicted drug dealers
from loitering in designated
areas and allows the police
to scatter crowds suspected
of dealing drugs.
The City Council in Grand
Prairie, Tex., passed an
ordinance last November
that allows the police to
scatter loiterers if officers
suspect drug dealing.
Officials in Cleveland are
considering rewriting an
anti-loitering measure intended
for prostitution after a
federal court struck down
an earlier version. And many
cities, including San Francisco
and New York, have
conducted sweeps designed
to remove homeless people
from the streets.
The action in Chicago drew
criticism from the
American Civil Liberties
Union here, which released a
statement saying it was
"disheartened" by the measure.
"This ensures that thousands
of innocent persons of
color will be arrested for
no good reason," the
A.C.L.U. statement said.
The measure won approval
from 15 blacks on the
Council, including Michael
Chandler, who said the
issue was not civil liberties,
but rather "people selling
heroin to our kids."
Several council members said
people were being made
prisoners in their homes
because they feared gang
members on street corners.
But Councilwoman Leslie Hairston,
who is black, said
the ordinance "legalizes
racial profiling." And another
black councilwoman, Dorothy
Tillman, called the
measure "anti-black" and
"inhumane."
Ms. Hairston also said neighborhoods
designated as
high-crime areas would see
property values fall.
Moves intended to make poor
neighborhoods safer
have been central to Mayor
Daley's popularity. He has
steadily built support among
blacks since first winning
office in 1989 with only
about 10 percent of the black
vote.
In her opinion last year,
Justice O'Connor said the
ordinance would be permissible
if its language would
take aim at loiterers "with
no apparent purpose other
than to establish control
over identifiable areas, to
intimidate others from those
areas or to conceal illegal
activities."
Mayor Daley said the new
measure was written to
follow Justice O'Connor's
suggestion.
City officials say they will
begin enforcement of the
measure in a month, after
working with community
leaders to select areas
that qualify under the ordinance.
The police superintendent,
Terry Hillard, who is black
and supports the measure,
said his officers would be
trained to enforce the measure
without overstepping its
scope. Critics of the earlier
version say the police
made indiscriminate sweeps
in some neighborhoods.
"What we're hoping to do
is give them a warning: 'You
don't need to be on this
corner,' " Mr. Hillard said.