Theoretical Methods
Luke A. Burke
Introduction
Our conceptualization of chemistry is built on theory. The beginnings of
the nineteenth century saw the development of Atomic Theory and only by
the end of that century did we have the acceptance of the existance of atoms
by all in the scientific community. The concept of the atom could explain
so many physical and chemical facts. Besides, by that time, Thomsom had
found a bit of the atom called an electron and Arrhenius' concept of anions
and cations was finding wide-spread acceptance and went a long way in explaining
concepts such as acid-base reactions and the electrical conductivity of
salt solutions.
It wasn't until the beginning of the twentieth century that credible theories
of the chemical bond began to appear. G. N. Lewis put forward his octet
theory in 1912 and 'Lewis electron dot structures' were quickly used to
explain the corresponance between bonding, structure, and the atom's position
in the periodic chart. Up to that point, chemical theory was built on empiricism:
from experimental facts one constructed a model (Kekule's hexagon for benzene,
Fischer projections, Rutherford's nuclear atom, Bohr's orbits, etc.) that
fit the facts and then could be used in turn to explain the properties of
whole classes of substances.
Yet, there was very little of a rational foundation to chemistry. That
is, starting with a collection of particles that we call nuclei and electrons,
how could we use only the electrostatic forces of attraction and repulsion
for charged particles to calculate any physical or chemical property? We
could not, until 1927 and the beginnings of Quantum Theory.
This part of the course is designed to introduce students to the concepts in Quantum^M
Chemistry which are needed to have a strong insight into the nature of the
structure of molecules and the bonding of the atoms which combine to form
these molecules. These concepts are mathematical in nature but the 'math' can
be reduced to pictorial concepts which seem to be so useful to chemists
involved with synthesis (Organic or Inorganic).
The student should come to this course equipped with general and organic
chemistry, physical chemistry, at least one semester of calculus, and a computer
account. We'll supply the rest. The first part of the course is an introduction
to the concepts of Quantum Chemistry. It serves as an introduction to the
concepts vital to a proper understanding of the new technique of molecular
modeling used currently by molecular biologists and pharmacists, as well
chemists and biophysicists. The gerund of the infinitive, to model, is spelled
'modeling' by many americans from the USA and modelling by those influenced by british english, e.g. canadians, irish, africans,
and those east of the Khyber Pass. Since I tend to forget where I am so
often, I will use the two orthographs throughout. (Although I did learn
in a New York grammar school that one doubles the l to keep the antepenult
o short in modelling. Otherwise, molecular modeling is akin to molecular
yodeling.)
Tools of the Trade
Models from Quantum MechanicsE = h * nu
or
E(oscillator) = h * nu
From X-ray diffraction studies we know that the nuclei have 'usual' bond
lengths for typical types of bonds: C-C, 1.54A; C=C,1.32A; CC(aromatic),1.40A;
C-H,1.08A; C-O,1.38A; C=O,1.24A; etc. An Angstrom (A) = 10**(-10)m. We also
observe typical bond angles: 109.5deg for sp3, 120deg for sp2, 180deg for
sp.
Molecular Mechanics is a branch of Computational Chemistry that deals with treating molecules as a collection of classical mechanical
interactions as pictured below. It has the advantage of being able to treat
molecules with thousands of atoms very quickly, as opposed to Quantum Mechanics which can only treat tens of atoms reliably and quickly enough. In Molecular Mechanics, each bond length and angle is assigned an optimum value and it costs energy
to displace atoms from these values. The amount of energy needed depends
on the stiffness of the spring and the amount of displacement. Typically
for these molecular mechanics programs, one chooses an input 'geometry',
or position of the nuclei and then the nuclei are moved in a way as to reduce
the steric strain on each atom. At each step, the steric strain is reduced
by eliminating the 'competition' between the atoms for remaining in a particular
place. In other words, the 'stiffer' double bond atoms will 'push' the atoms
in a single bond out of the way. One can go through thousands, even millions
of positions seeking the least energy - or 'most stable conformation'. Sometimes
the calculations leaves one in a higher enegy 'minimum' such as the gauche conformation rather than in a 'global minimum', such as the anti conformation, which is the most stable of all conformations.
We are know ready to make a model of molecules which resembles spheres
held together by springs. From Hook's Law we know that the vibrational frequency
is directly related to the strength of the spring, k or Hook's constant,
and inversely to the mass of the spheres:
nu(oscillator) = (k/mass)**1/2
or
E(oscillator)/h = (k/mass)**1/2
It is also seen that the force needed to pull or compress the spring, E is equal to the square of the distance away from the rest position, d times k, Hook's constant:
roughly, E = k * d**2



Whereas distortions to optimal bond distances and angles can be measured
experimentally, nonbonded interaction energies are more difficult contributions
to evaluate. These energy contributions are presently the subject of much
debate among developers of "Molecular Mechanics" programs.
Some of the names of these molecular mechanics programs are MM3, Amber,
charmm. When one uses the "clean" command in the GausView (gv) program,
the MM3 version is used.