October 10, 1999
In
E-Commerce Frenzy, Brave
New World Meets Old
By STEVE LOHR
When Amazon.com declared two weeks ago that it
was beginning a bold campaign to become an
Internet shopping bazaar,
Wall Street applauded. And
why not? Amazon, a corporate
poster child of the New
Economy and pioneer of on-line
retailing, would be
collecting money from any
business, large or small, that
wanted to set up shop under
its cyber-tent.
Besides,
Amazon really
needs the cash.
Its losses are
mounting, as
they are for
most Internet
merchants. But,
Amazon
explains, the
red ink merely
underlines the
scale of its
ambitious
investment for future growth.
And what is Amazon spending
so lavishly on these
days? Building a high-tech
bunker of supercomputers or
hiring battalions of software
wizards? No, Amazon is
spending much of its money
on a half-dozen huge
warehouses across the country.
The New Economy is increasingly
coming face-to-face
with the old: Net code hackers
and money hustlers meet
the members of Bricklayers
Local 247. The hot, new
fields of the Internet economy
suddenly include
distribution and logistics,
the humdrum backstage of
business. Indeed, as electronic
commerce moves into
the mainstream -- an estimated
17 million American
households will purchase
on line this year -- it has
prompted a new appreciation
for the business skills of
the old bricks-and-mortar
world.
Customers, it seems, still
have decidedly off-line
standards of service. They
demand timely delivery of
goods and the ability to
easily return merchandise that
proves disappointing, for
example.
The on-line retailers who
come up short on those
fronts, industry analysts
predict, will be casualties in
the coming consolidation
among on-line retailers -- a
Darwinian winnowing expected
to begin during this
year's Christmas shopping
season as winners are sorted
from losers.
"A lot of the dot-com retailers
are going to fold after
their venture capital money
runs out," observed David
Pecaut, a senior vice president
of the Boston Consulting
Group.
Curiously, the biggest winners
in on-line retailing could
well be today's department
stores, discount chains and
specialty stores.
In fact, 62 percent of E-commerce
sales are accounted
for by bricks-and-mortar
and catalog companies that
also have begun on-line
ventures. Within five years,
Mr. Pecaut expects that
share to rise to 85 percent as
companies like Wal-Mart,
Nordstrom and Sears
improve their performance
on the World Wide Web.
The
reason, he says, is that their assets from the
"legacy world" -- well-known brands, distribution
networks, stores and purchasing
power -- will prove to
be advantages, and increasingly
so in electronic
commerce. The leading on-line
brands like Amazon and
Ebay, for example, came
onto the marketplace a few
years ago as innovative
newcomers, when cyberspace
was far less crowded and
Internet brand-building was
far less costly. The chance
of an Internet start-up
gaining that kind of brand
recognition today, Mr. Pecaut
says, is slim.
"For marketers, the superior
economics in the future are
going to come from the old
standards of business -- and
not just being on line,"
he said.
The new catch phrases of
modern retailing have
embraced that notion: multi-channel
retailers,
integrated shopping and
360-degree marketing. All are
meant to convey the concept
of servicing -- or
assaulting -- the consumer
on many fronts, on line and
off.
Some Internet companies are
even using their
high-priced shares as currency
to buy
bricks-and-mortar counterparts.
For example, the
on-line auctioneer Ebay
purchased Butterfield &
Butterfield, a San Francisco-based
auction house
founded in 1865, for $260
million in stock earlier this
year.
The statistics for on-line
retail sales, and projections of
future revenue, show meteoric
growth. Yet a closer
look at the numbers suggests
how much traditional
retailing retains its hold,
despite the rapid,
up-from-zero growth of E-commerce.
On-line sales in
the United States will rise
sharply this year to $20
billion and jump to $185
billion by 2004, according to
Forrester Research Inc.,
a technology research firm in
Cambridge, Mass.
Still, the $185 billion figure,
even if it proves accurate,
would represent only 7 percent
of the nation's retail
sales in 2004, the firm
maintains.
The rise of the Internet
has clearly created not only new
wealth but a new sense of
economic opportunity.
"The essence of the new Internet
economy is its
ferocious speed, the faith
that this is a big deal and the
uncertainty that it will
pay off," said Thomas
Eisenmann, an E-commerce
expert at the Harvard
Business School.
The economic payoff from
Internet technology will
almost surely come first
in an area that gets the least
attention: its use as a
low-cost communications
technology to automate all
kinds of business
transactions. "The Amazons
of the world get all the
press, but the real growth
in electronic commerce in the
next five years is going
to be in the
business-to-business market,"
said Peter Schwartz,
chairman of the Global Business
Network, a consulting
firm.
ueling
that growth will be companies using the
Web instead of faxes, telephones and face-to-face
meetings to handle the "back
office" tasks involved in
trading with their corporate
customers and suppliers.
Forrester Research projects
that the
business-to-business market
could reach $1.5 trillion
by 2003.
But even the Internet-assisted
overhaul of dealings
among businesses in the
next few years represents an
evolutionary instead of
a revolutionary step. Much of
the anticipated transformation
amounts to doing the
same chores more efficiently
because of new
technology -- as was true
with the telephone and,
before that, the telegraph,
which has been called "The
Victorian Internet," in
a book published last year
(Walker & Company) by
Tom Standage.
And if the past is any guide,
the surest corporate
winners in the E-commerce
business may be the
suppliers of basic tools
and services for the Internet:
computers, software and
technical know-how. That, at
least, seemed to be the
lesson of the last great gold rush
in California. It was the
general stores and saloons, not
the miners, that pocketed
the steady money.