Now, AOL Everywhere
The Newest Giant Takes On Phones, TV and Microsoft
By SAUL HANSELL
DULLES,
Va. -- Over the last year, the walls of
America Online's rapidly expanding headquarters
here have been dotted with
plaques. They declare that
the company's mission is
"to build a global medium as
central to people's lives
as the telephone or television .
. . and even more valuable."
But wait. Aren't
telephones
everywhere? And
don't Americans
watch seven hours of
TV each day? How
can Stephen M. Case,
America Online's
chairman, dare to
think that his company
-- which just a few
years ago lurched
from one crisis to the
next and was largely a
chat service for
lonely teen-agers -- belongs
in the same league?
The answer is that America
Online, confounding the
skeptics, has emerged over
the last two years as the
biggest, most powerful company
on the Internet.
Indeed, an astounding 39
percent of the time Americans
spend online is spent using
services the company
controls, 10 times the share
of its nearest competitor,
Microsoft. AOL expects to
hit $5 billion in sales this
year, more than the next
20 Internet companies
combined and roughly the
size of NBC's. And the
company's market value of
$110 billion is bigger than
that of any other media
concern in the world.
So now Case, who has been
talking for years about
taking on television, has
a plan to realize the ambitions
of his most audacious rhetoric
-- for AOL to leap off
the computer and be everywhere,
all the time.
The plan has these parts:
The company will try to roughly
double the number of
subscribers, now 17 million,
to its flagship America
Online service over the
next five years or so. And it
will aim to add several
times as many users overseas
and through its other brands,
like Compuserve, ICQ and
Netscape.
It will develop new services
to lure users to stay online
as long as three hours a
day -- the current average is 55
minutes -- and, in the process,
make advertising
revenues as important to
the company as subscriber
fees.
And it will set out to subsume
all other media by
delivering its service on
television screens, cellular
telephones and myriad other
devices, in addition to
computers.
"Our goal is to establish
AOL as a more important part
of tens of millions of people's
everyday life," Case said
a few weeks ago, nibbling
jelly beans in his office.
"And to do that, we have
to move beyond the P.C. in the
den."
If America Online performs
as planned, fending off
media giants and the rapidly
growing army of
well-financed Internet
start-ups, Case may be able
to fulfill yet another
ambition: for AOL to be the
most valuable company in
the world. That would mean
achieving a market value
surpassing that of its
longtime rival, Microsoft,
now worth some $400
billion, or almost four times
its current value.
Outlandish? That depends
on how you look at it.
America Online's estimated
$378 million in earnings
for 1999 are barely 6 percent
of Microsoft's, so the
company has a long way to
go by traditional measures.
But for an Internet stock,
it remains cheap. After a 300
percent run up over the
last year, it is selling for about
31 times revenue, far less
than the 150 times for Yahoo.
America Online closed Friday
at $115 1/4.
Overtaking Microsoft is an
especially fitting goal,
because much of Case's plan
resembles the playbook of
none other than Bill Gates,
Microsoft's chairman.
And just as Microsoft has
come to dominate the
operating systems for personal
computers, AOL,
Microsoft and many other
companies are fighting to
control a new and crucial
form of operating system, in
essence for daily life.
As people wire their families,
their finances, their jobs
-- even their household
appliances -- into one vast
network, whoever ties it all
together will have much
say in how the electronic
future unfolds -- and possibly
capture much of the
profit.
"Windows is the past," Case
says flatly. "In the future,
AOL is the next Microsoft."
Like Microsoft as well, AOL
has adopted a "fast
follower" strategy. It can
afford to invest in the sort of
long-term projects that
smaller companies cannot. But
to avoid becoming too bureaucratic
and introverted, it
hopes to buy some of the
most creative start-ups.
Indeed, its $4.2 billion
acquisition of Netscape
Communications last year
was meant to inject Silicon
Valley culture into AOL
and to create a home base from
which to acquire more West
Coast start-ups, which
might balk at moving to
Virginia.
"America Online has a grand
vision and a size that lets
them achieve it like no
one else," said Edward A.
Bennett, the former head
of Prodigy, whose online
service AOL vanquished.
"Because they have so many
customers, they can sell
more products and services to
them. And they get the pick
of the content and services
because everyone else out
there who is smaller comes
to them for exposure to
their audience."
Microsoft certainly isn't
ceding any
ground. It is spending billions
of
dollars to insure that Windows
is
widely used in Internet-linked
devices ranging from cable
television boxes to cellular
phones.
And a big part of its antitrust
fight
with the Government is over
its
desire to funnel Windows
users to
its Internet browser and
the services
that flow from it.
Case's big plans also come
up
against the ambitions of
AT&T, the
nation's largest long-distance,
wireless telephone and cable
television company. With
its direct
control over connections
to millions
of homes, AT&T would
love to
drive traffic to its own
online
services, especially Excite@home,
a consortium of
cable companies developing
a high-speed Internet
service.
Of course, the World Wide
Web may defy any big
company's efforts to dominate
it; most Goliaths meet
their Davids. But so far,
America Online has grown
stronger from every challenge.
"I was the one who two years
ago said, 'Bye-bye,
AOL,' " said Halsey Minor,
the chairman of Cnet, a
technology news and shoping
Web site that just decided
to pay $14.5 million to
America Online for promotion
on its computing channel.
"What they have done is
extraordinary. They have
created a great business."
Going Where the Users Are
o
understand how Steve Case turned America
Online from laughable to extraordinary, follow a
typical suburban teen-ager
after school. You'll see that
e-mail and chat rooms are
as important to his social
system as cruising the mall
and talking on the phone. If
his parents want to cancel
AOL in favor of another
service, he may howl, because
all his friends are on
AOL.
But most parents don't want
to cancel AOL anyhow.
For the many adults who
are unsure of their
technological sea legs,
America Online has positioned
itself as the great life
vest of cyberspace.
"I don't know one
engineer in Silicon
Valley who uses
AOL," said Milo
Medin, the chief
technical officer and
founder of
Excite@home.
But, he conceded
grudgingly, "every
one of them has told
20 not-technical
people that AOL is
the best way to get on
the Internet."
Such endorsements can hardly
be credited to Case's
discipline as a day-to-day
manager. Distant and
taciturn, he has often allowed
his subordinates to
wander off on uncoordinated
pursuits. The company has
flip-flopped on numerous
important issues and
strategies and nearly collapsed
in early 1997, when its
phone lines were swamped.
But America Online prevailed,
in large part because
Case didn't waver on two
central ideas: first, that the
most important use of an
online service is
communicating with people,
and, second, that it is
better to be easy to use
than to have the most
sophisticated technology.
Moreover, Case's detachment
-- along with AOL's
intergalactic stock price
-- has allowed America
Online to recruit what is
generally regarded as the
deepest bench of top-quality
executives in any Internet
business.
Most important is Robert
W. Pittman, the president and
chief operating officer,
who gave the company
much-needed management discipline
and a flair for
marketing. There is the
flamboyant Theodore J.
Leonsis, once the company's
No. 2 executive, who is
now running the ICQ chat
service and a few other
youth-minded brands.
There is also Miles R. Gilburne,
the head of corporate
development, who concocted
some of the world's most
complex acquisition deals.
And on the rise is Barry M.
Schuler, who now runs most
of the programming
services and is spearheading
the company's forays into
the world of electronic
devices beyond the PC.
"The company is finally all
marching in the same
direction," said Jonathan
E. Sacks, now the head of the
America Online flagship
service. "It's not like this is a
cult, but the management
has done a good job in
rallying everybody around
a single and powerful
vision. Finally, the company
has become comfortable in
its own skin."
Many Buyers, Many Brands
o
listen to Bob Pittman is to hear parables about
business -- especially about the importance of a
well-promoted brand. He
draws from his experience as
a disk jockey, as a founder
of MTV and as the head of
the Six Flags theme parks
and, later, the Century 21 real
estate system.
Consider his explanation
for structuring America
Online to offer a series
of products, each with a
separate brand, rather than
unifying all of its services
under a single banner.
"The last time I did this
was at MTV," he explained in
his Mississippi drawl. "We
started VH1. Then we took
Nickelodeon and reformed
it as a channel for older
kids. It was no longer spinach,
but pizza."
In his vision, the America
Online service will remain
the mass-market brand. But
there will be others for
more specialized audiences:
Compuserve, repositioned
as a budget brand; ICQ,
a chat service for college types
too cool to use AOL; Netscape's
Netcenter Web site,
for business users. Coming
next is a Netscape-brand
online service filled with
the latest Web technology, to
follow Netcenter users home.
Besides drawing
more customers, the
company hopes the
multibrand strategy
will help fight off
competitors, like
Freeserve, which is
offering free Internet
access in Britain or
Free-PC, giving away
both access and a
computer in the
United States.
Instead of cutting
prices on the flagship
brand's service, the
company can use other brands,
notably Compuserve, to
match competitors' deals.
Last week, it announced a
plan to provide free
computers with three-year
Compuserve subscriptions.
"We can use our core infrastructure,
bought and paid
for by AOL, to create new
brands with a real cost
advantage," Pittman said.
Cable television is also
on Pittman's mind as he
considers America Online's
bottom line. The company
takes in, for each subscriber,
$19.44 a month in
subscription fees and $4.50
a month in advertising. He
hopes that those numbers
will eventually be about equal
-- and that both will grow
as AOL lures users to spend
more time and money online.
Indeed, Pittman looks at
broadband access and services
like the company's
planned interactive television
service as the equivalent
of premium cable channels
like HBO.
"If you really love AOL,
would you pay $10 a month
for AOLTV and five bucks
a month to get your AOL
e-mail on your Palm Pilot?"
Pittman asked. "I am loath
to predict the future, but
people pay 50 or 60 bucks a
month for cable. I think
people see us as comparable,
so we have a lot of headroom
to deliver value."
The Well Connected Life
ehind
Barry Schuler's
desk is a blue and red
box older than many of
AOL's employees. It is an
IMSAI 8080, one of the very
first personal computers,
and
it is a signal that in a
company devoted to the
technological novice,
Schuler is a true bit-head.
He recently put wireless
networks in his houses in
Virginia and San Mateo,
Calif., enabling his laptop
to
automatically collect his
e-mail whenever he walks
in.
Schuler joined AOL in 1995,
when the company bought
his firm, called Medior,
which designed games and
CD-ROM's Until a recent
promotion, his job was to
run the AOL service, and
he
used his designer's eye
to
help give it a cleaner,
more
consistent look.
The latest version of the
software, called 5.0, is
to be
introduced this fall. Instead
of simplicity, its focus
is the
addition of new features
intended to keep users
online.
One feature inspiring high
hopes here is called You've
Got Pictures, a joint effort
with Kodak to let people
send snapshots by e-mail.
Another is My Calendar,
which lets users keep their
appointment books online.
But why bother, when a
hand-held electronic organizer
-- or a paper calendar --
may be simpler? As always,
the answer is
communication. The service
will let a group arrange
the soccer carpool by bringing
together all the drivers'
schedules.
Each of these offerings is
meant to weave the details of
everyday life into AOL's
services, so that users will not
switch to other providers
but instead will be exposed
to more advertising and
more opportunities to buy
products inside AOL. The
photo service sells reprints
on mugs; the calendar service
hawks movie tickets from
Moviephone, recently acquired
by the company.
"The whole game is about
building the online habit,"
Schuler said.
That is also where electronic
appliances figure in
America Online's plans.
AOL is jockeying with many
competitors for position in
an ever more wired world
that is connecting the
Internet to the microprocessors
in everything from
microwave ovens to cell
phones.
Many other companies are
focusing on helping users
stay abreast of information
tidbits: stock quotes, say, or
news headlines. But building
on its heritage as the
online community's favorite
place to chat, AOL is
focusing on communication,
building on its existing
"buddy list" system, which
now shows users which of
their friends are online
and available for instant
messaging.
Say you want to crow about
that great play in the
N.B.A. finals. With one
mouse click, you will be able
to track down a fellow fan,
whether he's working on his
computer, watching television
or sitting in the stadium
with his cell phone. All
this will take a while. But AOL
users will be able to check
their e-mail on their Palm
Pilots by the end of this
year.
The most ambitious of the
planned services is AOLTV,
the company's version of
a concept -- interactive
television -- that has largely
flopped in other
incarnations. Since paying
$425 million for the
business in 1997, for example,
Microsoft has sold just
800,000 subscriptions to
its Web TV service, which is
marketed mainly as a way
for people who don't have
computers to get onto the
Internet.
By contrast, starting next
year, AOLTV will be sold
mainly as a $10-a-month
add-on for AOL subscribers.
It will allow Web surfing,
but the focus will be on
services tied to watching
television, like an elaborate
program guide and live chat
rooms that can be
superimposed on the screen
during popular shows.
"People are already writing
e-mail, sending instant
messages, watching television
and talking on the phone
at the same time," said
Anne M. Borsch, the head of the
AOL Devices unit. "We're
just making it easier for
them to do it all in one
place."
Getting Ahead of Broadband
ow
that it's clear that the company won't be done
in by the Web, the biggest worry for AOL
investors is broadband,
the new generation of
high-speed online connections.
So far, America Online is
locked out of offering
broadband access through
cable television systems,
which are generally seen
as the most promising of
several broadband technologies.
The company's responses to
questions about its
broadband strategy are contradictory.
Pittman spent a
good deal of a recent meeting
with Wall Street analysts
arguing that the threat
from broadband is overblown.
America Online's research,
he said, shows that demand
for high-speed service,
especially at the current price
of $40 to $50 a month, is
modest.
"Broadband doesn't sell itself,"
Pittman said in an
interview. "There is a small
group that says 'Yeah, it's
faster.' " But high speeds
don't make a difference to the
activities that AOL members
use most, he added,
saying, "Your e-mail doesn't
get any better with
broadband."
Even so, America Online is
hardly staying on the
sidelines. It is about to
introduce its own AOL Plus
broadband service, to be
marketed initially to
telephone customers of Bell
Atlantic and SBC
Communications. And AOL's
$1.5 billion investment
last month in Hughes Electronics
means that Hughes
will offer AOL Plus and
AOLTV over its Direct TV
satellite system.
The new 5.0 software will
have special audio and
video features for users
on fast connections. The
company has also hired a
former television executive to
develop broadband programming.
And it has begun an
extensive lobbying campaign
in Washington, pressing
regulators to force cable
companies to open their
systems to AOL.
America Online's hot-and-cold
rhetoric about
broadband makes sense when
seen as part of an
elaborate game of chicken
in which it is negotiating the
price and terms for gaining
access to cable systems.
Excite@home, which has contracts
granting it exclusive
control over high-speed
cable services at AT&T and
20 other cable companies
until at least 2002, argues
that it has the momentum
to be a powerful rival to AOL
-- even though it now has
only 500,000 subscribers.
"More than half our new customers
are ex-AOL users,"
said Tom Jermoluk, Excite@home's
chief executive.
Ultimately, though, America
Online is betting the cable
companies need it more than
it needs them.
Pittman argues that if anyone
can sell broadband, it is
America Online, because
the most likely prospective
buyers are its 17 million
members. "We realize that
we're one of the few who
can write the big check," he
said.
Isn't that a little close
to the sort of
offer-you-can't-refuse tactics
that got Microsoft in hot
water?
Not to worry, says Case,
raising the bar slightly higher
on his hyperbolic ambitions
-- and throwing a dig at
Gates and company.
"Hopefully, we will establish
AOL as the most
valuable and the most respected
company," he said.
"We won't settle for just
one of them."