FOREIGN AFFAIRS / By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
Reality Bytes
Is this a story we will read sometime in the next year?
NEW
YORK (NYT) -- The Dow Jones industrial
average dropped 1,266 points today after
Amazon.com announced that
it had inadvertently made
a profit.
After years of having persuaded
investors that its
business model called for
it to consistently lose money
until it had built up its
market share, Amazon stunned
Wall Street by announcing
earnings of 1 cent per share
this quarter on sales of
$1.1 trillion, or 10 percent of
U.S. G.D.P.
The reason these earnings
rattled Wall Street was that
investors began to realize
that no matter how big
Amazon's market share became
its profit margins were
going to remain razor thin
because it is now competing
with everyone -- not just
booksellers. And therefore its
market capitalization --
the company is valued at more
than Fort Knox -- was simply
not sustainable.
"Pie in the sky is always
great as long as the pie
remains in the sky," said
one Wall Street broker, "but
when the pie actually comes
down to earth and you get
to see what a real slice
looks like -- well, you have a
problem. Amazon's whole
strategy was to keep the pie
in the sky. But now they've
blown it by accidentally
making a profit."
The Seattle-based Internet
retailer issued a statement
following its quarterly
earnings report, saying: "The
Amazon board wants to apologize
to shareholders for
completely missing its quarterly
loss target and
inadvertently making a profit.
The board has been
assured by management that
this problem will be
rectified in the coming
quarter. Amazon intends to
increase both its advertising
budget and the number of
books it will sell at a
loss to insure that it returns to
unprofitability by the next
quarter. Our shareholders
can rest assured that our
primary goal remains market
share and our business motto
remains: 'Amazon.com:
We took the 'E' out of P/E.'
"
Said one Wall Street Internet
analyst: "Look, I believe
the Internet changes everything.
I've taken the
Kool-Aid. But I think the
question of whether Jeff
Bezos [Amazon's founder]
will ever make the massive
profits that his stock price
implies is really uncertain."
It will depend on at least
three things, the analyst said.
The first is, Are Amazon's
competitors dead or are they
just behind? Has Mr. Bezos
killed Wal-Mart, Barnes &
Noble, Best Buy, Borders,
Toys "R" Us and Circuit
City -- all of which he
is now competing against? Or,
has he just showed them
the power of the Internet as a
retailing tool and all these
brick-and-mortar companies
will now become clicks and
bricks?
"If that is the case," the
analyst said, "all Amazon will
have done is to build market
share for the day when its
rivals catch up. If it hasn't
made money up to now, with
its huge head start on the
Internet, how is it going to
make big money when the
others catch up? The cost of
switching from Amazon to
another retailer is zero on
the Internet.
It's just one click. Wal-Mart
hasn't even come into
cyberspace in any serious
way yet -- and those guys are
meaner than junk-yard dogs.
You think they're going to
let Amazon just put them
out of business? No way."
The second thing Amazon's
future depends on, said this
analyst, is what inning
we are in.
If we are still in the first
inning as far as Internet
retailing is concerned,
maybe Amazon, or another
Amazon soon to be born,
will come up with yet another
innovation for using the
Internet to sell things at a
profit. But if we are already
in, say, the fifth inning, if
the basic Internet revolution
in retailing is now in place
and the rest is just execution,
then the Wal-Marts will
eventually learn to execute.
Amazon might still be a
winner -- it is a phenomenal
marketer -- but not a
winner-take-all.
The third unknown, the analyst
said, is whether Amazon
can use its high stock price
to buy one or more already
profitable brick-and-mortar
retailer in order to go head
to head with Wal-Mart. At
first people thought all
business was moving to the
Net; now they see that the
Net is moving into business.
The next big merger wave
will be between virtual
companies and real ones.
"I swear, I thought Bezos'
actual plan was to skip
making a profit and go directly
from being an I.P.O. to
being an N.G.O. for distributing
books cheaply," said
another analyst. "I don't
know what Amazon's future is
as a company -- but as a
charity, wow! What a
write-off machine! It could
have been called
'Unicef.com.' Really, who's
given away more kids'
books at cost than Amazon?
Bezos had a chance to be
Andrew Carnegie -- without
ever making a dime. Now
he's blown it by making
a profit and forcing everyone to
look at Amazon like, well,
a real company. I mean, who
needs that?"